Identifying over-the-counter information to prioritize for the purpose of reducing adverse drug reactions in older adults: A national survey of pharmacists.

BACKGROUND: Over-the-counter (OTC) medication use is associated with risks of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), particularly among older adults. The Drug Facts Label (DFL) is supposed to provide consumers with information that would avoid ADRs, yet research suggests that consumers frequently fail to interact with this critical information. We postulate that emphasizing critical information by placing it on the front of the package may increase its usage. Before doing so, the most critical information from the DFL needs to be identified. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine which information from the DFL is most critical in reducing ADRs at the time of purchase or use by older adults. METHODS: A national survey of practicing pharmacists knowledgeable about OTC medication use by older adults asked participants to rank order the importance of the DFL sections to reduce ADRs in older adults. Open-ended questions focused on identifying ways of improving OTC medication labeling. Quantitative rankings were used to calculate the content validity ratio and analyzed using Wilcoxon signed rank tests. Qualitative results were categorized into themes. RESULTS: A total of 318 responses (12% response rate) were analyzed. There was high consensus that uses and purpose, active ingredient, warnings, and directions for use were the most important sections of the DFL. Within the warning section, 2 specific warnings, "Do not use" and "Ask a doctor or pharmacist," were deemed most important. Similarly, qualitative themes focused on seeking health care provider assistance or were specific to age-related precautions. CONCLUSIONS: Prioritizing warnings that highlight the importance of possible drug-drug and drug-disease precautions and the need to seek medical advice before taking OTC medications were deemed most critical. Moving this type of information to the front of the package may help reduce ADRs among older adults.

Impact of a pilot community pharmacy system redesign on reducing over-the-counter medication misuse in older adults.

BACKGROUND: No interventions have attempted to decrease misuse of over-the-counter (OTC) medications for adults aged 65 years or older (older adults) by addressing system barriers. An innovative structural pharmacy redesign (the Senior Section) was conceptualized to increase awareness of higher-risk OTC medications. The Senior Section contains a curated selection of OTC medications and is close to the prescription department to facilitate pharmacy staff-patient engagement to reduce misuse. OBJECTIVE: This pilot study examined the Senior Section's effectiveness at influencing OTC medication misuse in older adults. METHODS: A pretest-post-test nonequivalent groups design was used to recruit 87 older adults from 3 pharmacies. Using a hypothetical scenario, the participants selected an OTC medication that was compared with their medication list and health conditions, and their reported use was compared with the product labeling. Misuse outcomes comprised drug-drug, drug-disease, drug-age, and drug-label, with 5 subtypes. Patient characteristics were compiled into a propensity score matching logistic regression model to estimate their effects on the Senior Section's association with misuse at pre- or postimplementation. RESULTS: Patient characteristics were uniform between pre- and postimplementation, and, once entered into a propensity score matching model, drug-label misuse (exceeds daily dosage) statistically significantly lessened over time (z = -2.42, P = 0.015). In addition, the Senior Section reduced drug-label misuse (exceeds single dosage) for both the raw score model (z = -6.38, P = 0.011) and the model in which the patient characteristics propensity score was added (z = -5.82, P = 0.011). Despite these limited statistical effects, misuse was found to decrease after implementation for 7 of 11 comparisons. CONCLUSION: These nascent outcomes begin providing an evidence base to support a well-conceived, pharmacy-based OTC medication-aisle redesign for reducing older adult OTC medication misuse. The Senior Section, when broadly implemented, creates permanent structures and processes to assist older adults to access risk information when selecting safer OTC medications.

Patient attitudes regarding pharmacist-administered memory screening in community pharmacies.

OBJECTIVES: To describe patient attitudes toward pharmacist-administered memory screening in community pharmacies and assess patient satisfaction with screening in this venue. METHODS: One pharmacist in each of two pharmacies performed a background assessment and administered the Mini-Mental State Examination, the category (animal) fluency test, and the clock-drawing test to participants 60 to 75 years of age with no previous diagnosis of cognitive impairment and who were not taking a prescribed medication for dementia. Participants then completed a 28-item Likert-type scale evaluation. Responses to survey items of "agree" and "strongly agree" were aggregated. RESULTS: 26 participants were recruited with a mean (±SD) age of 66.7 ± 5.5 years. Agree and strongly agree response rates of 75% or greater were considered indicative of strongly positive attitudes or beliefs and likely to influence participants' decisions to be screened in community pharmacies. The majority of participants responded favorably to several aspects of offering memory screening in pharmacies, including the accuracy of testing by a trained pharmacist (84%), willingness to be screened by a trained pharmacist (80%), willingness to undergo annual screening (92%), and convenience of the pharmacy as a location for memory screening (100%). A slightly lower percent of participants (72%) agreed or strongly agreed that they would be willing to have their memory tested in any pharmacy offering the service. Less than one-half of participants (45.5%) indicated that they would be willing to pay out of pocket for the screening. CONCLUSION: Responses to the evaluation and statistically significant correlations among evaluation items suggested that memory screening by pharmacists in community pharmacies was a feasible, acceptable, and convenient venue for routine screening.

Geriatric pharmacy education: a strategic plan for the future.

The aging of the US population will have a major effect on the future practice of pharmacy. By 2030, 20% of Americans will be aged 65 years and older, an increase from 12.4% in 2000. A challenge to colleges and schools of pharmacy in the 21st century is to prepare students and practitioners to meet the growing pharmaceutical care needs of the older adult population and to meet these needs in a variety of care settings. This paper reviews the present state of geriatric pharmacy education and training, including strategies for ensuring that practicing pharmacists will have adequate knowledge, skills, attitudes, and values to provide this care. Secondly, this report provides strategic directions and recommendations for successfully implementing geriatrics curricula at an institutional level.